And another thing...

I'm also weighing the merits of keeping versus stopping this blog during my job search. If you have my full name and you Google me, you get this site. And if I'm asking you to let me manage your ethical purchasing or in-store brand, will this help or hurt me?

Decisions, decisions. Frankly, I think my shelf-life in search engines will outlive me even if I DO down this site, so the choice may be already made for me.

Comments

Coaster Punchman said…
Maybe just remove any posts that you wouldn't want a prospective employer to see. And, don't ever use your last name.
6:36 pm
Cup said…
Or come up with a new name for your corporate life. That's so secret agent and bad-ass!
10:07 pm
Writeprocrastinator said…
With this blog? It could do nothing but help. Some other blogs, however...
8:56 am
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ways other than Paul Blart and lipstick to combat economic depression

They say that, when the economy tanks and you can't see any way through your pile of bills and are wondering who you'll look wearing one of those barrels with shoulder straps, women buy lipstick and everyone goes to upbeat, escapist movies to take their minds off their troubles. But I'm here to tell you that any lipstick worth having is nigh 'bout $20 or more and you'll just end up regretting it, and Hollywood has not caught up with the times yet. Plus, it's Oscar season, so once you've seen Slumdog Millionaire your choices are sexy Nazis seducing children, attractive suburbanites mourning the death of their dreams, and nuns and priests talking about child abuse. (That said, I hear Gran Torino is a good diversion with a message, and if you don't hate Brad Pitt as much as I do you could probably sit through that Owen Meany movie where he ages like he's from Ork .) And while I'm as big a Kevin James fan as the next person, you can't ask him
Read more

Empathize this

I've got two things on my mind today. First off, I really like Sonja Sotomayor. And I especially like that when discussing his selection criteria for Justice Souter's replacement, President Obama brought up empathy. Empathy is not the same thing as sympathy, compassion or emotion. Empathy is perspective. The idea that our laws have strict, specific definitions that should be considered without perspective is ridiculous. Laws mean something, but they must also be considered in context. That isn't to say they should be applied arbitrarily, or to advocate making exceptions left and right to suit a judge's whim...suggesting laws should be considered in context simply means that the courts must consider how our laws should be interpreted, and how they can make our society a better, more habitable, more functional one. How they can help Americans live their lives without impediment to their personal liberties. Empathy provides the perspective necessary to do this. Judge So
Read more